Reliable classes for terrain and analysis
LiDAR Classification Services
Assign point classes against agreed definitions, with review of terrain, ambiguous objects and classification errors.
Discuss this service ↗︎Classes that support terrain, analysis and extraction with fewer corrections.
Custom class tables aligned to your workflow
Human review of ambiguity and systematic errors
When to bring in this service.
- LiDAR producers needing classification overflow
- Teams correcting automated or legacy classifications
- Utility, forestry and terrain programs with custom classes
Bare-earth production
Ground separated from vegetation, structures, bridges, noise and other non-terrain returns.
Land-cover separation
Vegetation, buildings, water and project-specific features prepared for mapping and analysis.
Utility classification
Poles, conductors and elevated infrastructure classified where density and geometry make them reliably identifiable.
Standard or custom classes, resolved against real terrain context.
LiDAR classification services for ground, vegetation, buildings, water, utilities, noise and custom LAS classes.
Ground and non-ground classification
Low, medium and high vegetation
Building and structure classes
Water and bridge classes; project-specific flag rules
Utility poles and wires
Noise and withheld-point review
Production workflow
Every project begins with a representative sample and measurable acceptance criteria.
Profile
Measure density, scan characteristics, terrain, land cover and existing class use.
Calibrate
Approve a representative tile and lock class definitions and exception handling.
Classify
Use automated processing with systematic manual correction and targeted 3D review.
Audit
Check class confusion, artifacts, omissions, tile seams and metadata before release.
Checks to agree with your reviewers.
Checks are selected from the actual deliverable specification and confirmed during calibration.
- Class confusion sampling
- Ground-surface artifact review
- Noise and withheld-point checks
- Seams, metadata and custom-class use
Work with the data you already capture.
Start with a source inventory and a representative sample. Confirm transfer arrangements before sharing restricted data.
Judge the classes against an agreed reference sample.
Include the class and flag specification, per-tile class summaries, review findings and unresolved areas with the classified files.
- Compare representative terrain and land cover with agreed reference labels
- Review omission and commission by relevant class, with the sample size stated
- Check ground-derived surfaces, tile boundaries and class/flag combinations
Before you send a sample.
Do you provide LAS classification and reclassification?+
Yes. Altivue Geospatial classifies raw data and corrects existing classified LAS/LAZ against standard or custom class definitions.
Can poles and wires be classified?+
Yes, where point density and geometry support reliable identification. The pilot defines what is consistently attainable.
How is classification quality measured?+
Quality controls include class-use validation, systematic visual review, targeted sampling, surface checks and documented exceptions.
Discuss the scope
and required outputs.
Share the approximate volume, required outputs and acceptance criteria. Altivue Geospatial will define a focused production pilot.